Posts Tagged ‘Epstein Island’

Letter to Chief District Judge may bring answers

Chief Judge Paul T. Benshoof

by Timothy Charles Holmseth on May 4, 2018 at 6:11 P.M. CST

On December 13, 2017, Honorable Tamara Yon, a judge in Polk County, Minnesota classified a series of audio recordings submitted to the court on CD’s as “evidence” in an Order.

The audio evidence is now public record.

The audio recordings capture a lawyer exploiting her status as an attorney while touting personal connections to police and CPS as she threatened and coerced a witness in a national profile kidnapping case into a situation that involved the young mother signing away the custody rights of her baby under threat of imprisonment.

The young mother targeted by the lawyer was not the lawyer’s client and was not asking the lawyer for advice or help.

The existence of the evidence, which also includes information about child pornography and fake adoptions, has created a very serious question. Have ANY of the judges, lawyers, or police that are documented as handling and/or using the evidence reported the content to the proper authorities?

It’s a critical question because Minnesota rules of judicial conduct have very defined codes regarding misconduct – and reporting the conduct of another attorney.

The following codes apply:

(B) A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question regarding the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropriate authority.

(a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of the applicable Code of Judicial Conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority.

We may soon know.

Today, Timothy Charles Holmseth submitted a letter to Honorable Paul T. Benshoof, Chief Judge of Minnesota’s Ninth District that reads in part:

* * * * *

Honorable Benshoof:

I am contacting Your Honor because:

  1. I want to alert you to a situation that may involve widespread and systemic misconduct within the Ninth Minnesota Judicial District.
  1. I need to know, for my own legal affairs, moving forward, if the misconduct has been reported.

The situation involves an ongoing cover-up by a group of judicial officers in the Ninth Minnesota District that are acutely aware that a lawyer has allegedly possessed child pornography of a missing child, facilitated fake adoptions, conducted international baby sales, and coerced/threatened a young mother who was a kidnapping witness into surrendering the custody rights of her baby in a bid to obtain a false statement.

I have no evidence at this time that any judge or lawyer has reported the misconduct to the appropriate authority as required by applicable rules.

I am referring primarily to:

PROFESSIONAL RULES – CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDCUT – Rule 2.15 – Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct

MINNESOTA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 8.3 REPORTING PROFESSIONAL MISCONDCUT and 8.4 MISCONDUCT

* * * * *

RULES CITED

Rule 2.15Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct

(A) A judge having knowledge that another judge has committed a violation of this Code that raises a substantial question regarding the judge’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a judge in other respects shall inform the appropriate authority.

(B) A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question regarding the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropriate authority.

(C) A judge who receives credible information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a violation of this Code shall take appropriate action.

(D) A judge who receives credible information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct shall take appropriate action.

RULE 8.3: REPORTING PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority. (b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of the applicable Code of Judicial Conduct that raises a substantial question as to the judge’s fitness for office shall inform the appropriate authority.

RULE 8.4: MISCONDUCT It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: (a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another; (b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects; (c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; (d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; (e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; (f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law; (g) harass a person on the basis of sex, race, age, creed, religion, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, ethnicity, or marital status in connection with a lawyer’s professional activities; 117 (h) commit a discriminatory act prohibited by federal, state, or local statute or ordinance that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s fitness as a lawyer. Whether a discriminatory act reflects adversely on a lawyer’s fitness as a lawyer shall be determined after consideration of all the circumstances, including: (1) the seriousness of the act, (2) whether the lawyer knew that the act was prohibited by statute or ordinance, (3) whether the act was part of a pattern of prohibited conduct, and (4) whether the act was committed in connection with the lawyer’s professional activities; or (i) refuse to honor a final and binding fee arbitration award after agreeing to arbitrate a fee dispute.

SUPPORT TIM WITH A ONE TIME DONATION VIA PAY PAL

by Timothy Charles Holmseth on April 19, 2018 at 10:01 A.M. CST

Journalist’s publishing court records regarding an organized kidnapping and child pornography operation are being targeted at their homes by Minnesota police.

On April 11, 2018 a police officer from Inver Grove Heights Police Department visited the home of Sarah Westall, a business professor at the University of Minnesota that operates a journalism business.

Professor Sarah Westall

Professor Westall said she was visited by an ‘Officer Sloan’ who asked her to remove source/reference audios she published regarding a video report she produced and posted on You Tube.

Officer Sloan was visiting Professor Westall at the behest of a court officer from Broward County, Florida that called the police to complain about the audios being published.

Professor Westall’s story pertained to Timothy Charles Holmseth, a journalist from East Grand Forks, Minnesota that was interviewed by the FBI in 2009 regarding evidence he obtained from key figures in a national profile kidnapping in Florida – a situation that found Holmseth targeted with death threats and voice changer calls.

One of the threatening calls came from Clinton Global on Holmseth’s Caller ID.

Professor Westall told the police officer that everything she published was public data from court records and she was not obligated to remove it.

Professor Westall said Sloan admitted she had not broken any law.

déjà vu 

History was literally repeating itself.

The Florida court officer that called the Inver Grove Heights Police on Professor Westall did the exact same thing in 2009 to Holmseth.

In 2009, Lt. Rodney Hajicek with the East Grand Forks Police Department telephoned Holmseth and suggested he stop publishing information about a Broward County, Florida court officer whom Holmseth interviewed regarding a national profile child kidnapping.

Hajicek made the ominous call to Holmseth as a favor to the court officer – admitting Holmseth had broken no law.

JEFFREY EPSTEIN

Holmseth’s communications with the court officer included Holmseth being copied on internal law office emails along with Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler. The Florida law firm was headed by now infamous federal prisoner and Ponzi schemer Scott W. Rothstein who ran the largest Ponzi scheme in the history of Florida that involved victims of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.

Epstein is infamous for his flight logs that show he flew elites such as Bill and Hillary Clinton to his private island known as ‘Pedophile Island’.

POLICE CONSPIRACY

In 2012, secret emails from the private Gmail account of Lt. Hajicek revealed that in 2009, Hajicek began conspiring against Holmseth with a CNN journalist named Art Harris after FBI agents in Florida began using information they received from Holmseth about a missing child named HaLeigh Cummings.

In one email between Hajicek and Harris, Harris speaks of Holmseth to Hajicek and says, “He’s got to be stopped”.

BAR complaint records reveal Harris worked for the Florida court officer.

In 2009 during recorded interviews, a court officer from Broward County, Florida boasted to Holmseth she telephoned the Palatka Daily News and told the editor she wanted one of their news reporters “fucking fired”.

In 2017, Wikstrom Telephone Company, Karlstad, Minnesota contacted Holmseth and told him they could no longer host his website due to intimidating communications they were receiving.

HOLMSETH ARRESTED

On February 19, 2018 the EGFPD arrested Holmseth for allegedly publishing court records without redacting a certain name in violation of a court order from Broward County, Florida.

The court records Holmseth allegedly published included audio of eyewitnesses to child pornography, organized international child sex trafficking, and judicial kidnapping.

PLEASE HELP ME  https://www.paypal.me/AuthorTCH

Learn More www.writeintoaction.com

by Timothy Charles Holmseth on April 9, 2018 at 11:15 A.M. CST

Extremely disturbing audio evidence regarding crimes against children will be forefront in a formal ‘Request for Inquiry’ set to be filed with the Minnesota Lawyer Professional Responsibility Board. Timothy Charles Holmseth is filing a formal complaint against Ronald Galstad, an attorney with Galstad, Jensen, & McCann, East Grand Forks, Minnesota.

Ronald Galstad

Galstad’s private law office does contract ‘prosecutions’ on behalf of the City of East Grand Forks.

Holmseth is a former award winning news reporter and FBI witness in the 2009 kidnapping of missing child HaLeigh Cummings.

Holmseth asserts that exhibitive evidence and audio discs he filed in support of a Motion to the 9th Minnesota District Court in 2017, which are now public record, resulted in a favorable ruling by Honorable Tamara Yon.

The Honorable Tamara Yon

Timothy Holmseth asserts audio evidence from a Minnesota court case in Polk County, Minnesota implicates Attorney Ronald Galstad for violating rules of the Minnesota BAR Association.
Above: Discs published by William K. Murtaugh, at http://www.murtwitnessonelive.com. Murtaugh obtained the discs from Polk County Court Administration.

Holmseth says the evidence proves beyond any doubt Galstad is in violation of BAR rules including:

  • RULE 8.3: REPORTING PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT (a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct that raises a substantial question as to that lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects, shall inform the appropriate professional authority.
  • RULE 8.4: MISCONDUCT It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to: (a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another; (b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects; (c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation; (d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice; (e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or other law; (f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law;

This is a developing story.

DONATE – PAY PAL

More info at www.writeintoaction.com