VISIT WWW.WRITEINTOACTION.COM
FBI informant formal… on FBI informant formally warns P… | |
Kenny on FBI informant formally warns P… | |
T on FBI informant formally warns P… | |
Christian Warrior on FBI informant formally warns P… | |
Zechariah on FBI informant formally warns P… |
by Timothy Charles Holmseth on January 17, 2016 at 10:03 P.M.
Almost Avery
Why Steven Avery deserves a new trial
by Timothy Charles Holmseth on January 10, 2016 at 12:14 A.M.
http://writeintoaction.com/Almost%20Avery.html
ALSO – RECCOMENDED LISTENING
(Federal Lawsuit and Justice for HaLeigh Cummings and Caylee Anthony)
First Amended Complaint
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff, Timothy Holmseth, hereby sues Defendants, CITY OF EAST GRAND FORKS; RONALD GALSTAD, in his official and individual capacity as EAST GRAND FORKS CITY ATTORNEY; BARB ERDMAN, in her official and individual capacity as Sheriff of Polk County, Minnesota; MICHAEL HEDLUND in his official and individual capacity as EAST GRAND FORKS CHIEF OF POLICE; JAMES RICHTER in his official and individual capacity as (former) DIRECTOR OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY – EAST GRAND FORKS; DAVID MURPHY, in his official and individual capacity as EAST GRAND FORKS CITY ADMINISTRATOR; MICHAEL LACOURSIERE, public defender for MINNESOTA PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, in his official and individual capacity; RODNEY HAJICEK in his official and individual capacity as EAST GRAND FORKS POLICE OFFICER; AEISSO SCHRAGE, in his official and individual capacity as EAST GRAND FORKS POLICE OFFICER; JEANNETTE RINGUETTE, in her official and individual capacity; JOHN DOE in his/her official and individual capacity; and MICHAEL NORLAND, a deputy at the Polk County Sheriff’s Office in his official and individual capacity.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This 42 U.S.C. 1983 Deprivation of Rights case has been brought in the fullness of time. Facts and circumstances set forth herein show that in 2008, Timothy Charles Holmseth (hereby referred to as Plaintiff or Holmseth), a respected and law abiding citizen, un-wittingly re-located into an area that was infested with corruption, of which he soon became the target. In 1999, the East Grand Forks Economic Development and Housing Authority (EDHA) loaned a company called Boardwalk Enterprises LLP $510,000 at zero percent interest for a post-flood building project. Annual $30,000 payments were scheduled to begin in 2003 and finish in 2019. The mortgage was never filed and no payments were ever made on the loan. The building in question was owned by the Mayor’s brother; and two city attorneys had been quietly involved in the conspiracy of silence as a small group of public officials were quietly running out the statute of limitations on the fraud and money laundering scheme. In 2008, Plaintiff, an award-winning news reporter re-located to East Grand Forks, Minnesota from Breckenridge, Minnesota where he had been the Minnesota Government Reporter for the Wahpeton Daily News. He began a freelance writing service, and in 2009 he established media agreements with legal professionals in Florida involved in the search for a missing child named HaLeigh Cummings. SEE EXHIBIT A Soon thereafter, Plaintiff learned he had interviewed law enforcement’s suspects in the HaLeigh Cummings kidnapping; as well as parties/witnesses involved in the Casey Anthony murder trial. The missing child HaLeigh Cummings’ mother’s REDACTED, REDACTED REDACTED, had been questioned by law enforcement per their belief she transported HaLeigh across state lines. Plaintiff interviewed REDACTED REDACTED, and she advised that she herself was legally represented by a Florida law firm, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, & Adler. In 2010, Scott Rothstein, CEO of the law firm, having pled guilty to RICO charges was sentenced to 50 years in prison. Scott Rothstein operated the biggest Ponzi scheme in the history of Florida – $1.2 Billion. REDACTED REDACTED told Plaintiff she was “coordinating” leads in the HaLeigh Cummings investigation and working closely with Putnam County Sheriff’s Office detectives including Captain Dominic Piscitello and Detective Peggy Cone. REDACTED told Plaintiff REDACTED team of “investigators” were working on the HaLeigh Cummings case. Plaintiff would soon discover REDACTED ‘team of investigators’ consisted of felons, pedophiles, and human traffickers. William Staubs, a private investigator working for REDACTED REDACTED, told Plaintiff that REDACTED REDACTED and REDACTED, REDACTED REDACTED, were involved in a biofuels deal that guaranteed them a back-door government contract involving Scott Rothstein and (then) Florida Governor Charlie Christ, in the hundreds of millions of dollars. William Staubs sent Plaintiff an audio recording of REDACTED REDACTED talking to another kidnapping suspect, Jeremiah Regan, and telling him she had been promised $231 Million. Staubs told Dana Treen at the Jacksonville Times-Union that REDACTED REDACTED promised Jeremiah Regan $2 Million if he kept his mouth shut. In June of 2009 REDACTED REDACTED and her associates began calling the East Grand Forks Police Department (EGFPD) in Minnesota and asking for special favors – particularly – they wanted the local police to circumvent the media contract that existed between Plaintiff and REDACTED REDACTED, and use law enforcement powers to prevent Plaintiff from writing about the kidnapping and stop him from cooperating with the FBI. The callers were using a paid media consultant, who sometimes appeared on the Nancy Grace Show, but was falsely identifying himself as a CNN reporter, to un-nerve the local police department and local newspaper. The City of East Grand Forks and rogue elements of the judicial community lay siege to Plaintiff’s publication and utilized virtually every government and law enforcement resource available to them as they set out to violate Plaintiff’s rights. Plaintiff’s ability to thrive was completely and utterly decimated by the non-stop tyrannical activities of the corrupt officials that endeavored to destroy his reputation, business, and family. Between 2009 and 2014, Plaintiff was stalked from job to job, forced to live on welfare; and defamed beyond comprehension. But he persevered. He continued operating his publication on a shoe-string budget, while independently investigating local officials, gathering information, and reporting the corrupt and illegal activities to state and federal law enforcement. In December of 2013 Plaintiff reported the City of East Grand Forks to the Minnesota State Auditor and requested and audit and investigation. In April of 2014 an audit exposed the tip of the ice-berg that Plaintiff was investigating when the Grand Forks Herald and WDAZ reported ‘$510,000 loan to EGF goes unpaid for 10 years’. EDHA Director James Richter would soon retire under a cloud of suspicion. As an investigation into the ‘Boardwalk Enterprises’ scandal continued, EGF City Attorney Ronald Galstad would be replaced by an outside attorney where the investigation of ‘Boardwalk Enterprises’ was concerned. An official public (closed door) meeting held on May 7, 2014, between EGF city officials and representatives of Boardwalk Enterprises at the private office of Ronald Galstad (Galstad, Jensen, and McCann). EGF Administrator David Murphy told WDAZ that city officials met with Boardwalk Enterprises and their “attorney”. When asked later, Brad Sinclair, the attorney representing the City, would not discuss who Boardwalk Enterprise’s attorney was at the May 7, 2014 meeting. The City would also not state whether or not Ronald Galstad represented the City at the meeting. Facts and circumstances indicate Ronald Galstad may have been the attorney for both Boardwalk Enterprises and the City at the same meeting. On August 25, 2014, the Grand Forks Herald reported that Minnesota Open Meeting law expert, Attorney Mark Anfinson, determined EGF officials had violated the Minnesota Open Meeting Law on August 11, 2014, when they met behind closed doors with Boardwalk Enterprises. It was clear City officials were/are attempting to cover-up and conceal the identity of all the players in the Boardwalk Enterprises money laundering scheme by holding illegal meetings not open to the public. The City of East Grand Forks and the 9th Minnesota Judicial District is infested with corruption of rogue officials. Set forth herein – evidence, records, facts, circumstances, testimony, and witnesses, reveal both James Richter and Ronald Galstad, along with the assistance of the EGFPD, other government employees, as well as judicial officers, began violating Plaintiff’s rights in 2009 and never stopped. SPECIAL CIRCUMSTANCES Because Plaintiff’s computer’s hard-drive was rendered inoperable while in the custody of the EGFPD, the exhibits presented in support of this Complaint are not all the exhibits that exist. Rather, the attached exhibits are the exhibits Plaintiff could readily acquire at the time of this filing.
ART HARRIS
THE FLORIDA DIVORCE COURT SCHEME
PLAINTIFF COERCED INTO PLEA DEAL UNDER EXTREME DURESS – PART ONE OF A TWO PART PLAN TO FALSELY CONVICT PLAINTIFF
THE GROUNDWORK FOR PART 2 OF THE PLAN IS LAID DOWN
Timothy Charles Holmseth In Re: Disaster Relief Fraud / Money Laundering 08/25/2014 Denis J. McInerney Chief McInerney, BACKGROUND I am presently the Plaintiff in Holmseth v. City of East Grand Forks et al. – – U.S. District of Minnesota case number 14 – CV – 2970 – (DWF/LIB) – – 42 – U.S.C. – 1983 (Deprivation of Rights). PURPOSE East Grand Forks city employees and elected leaders are using their positions to steal government money and enrich themselves. The flow of funds originated from state and federal disaster relief that came as result of the historic flooding of the Red River in 1997. I reported the City of EGF to the Minnesota State Auditor on December 8, 2013, and requested an audit. At some point an audit was called for. On April 30, 2014, the Grand Forks Herald reported ‘$510,000 loan to EGF goes unpaid for 10 years’. The fraud was connected to a group of local officials including the mayor, city attorney, EDHA director, and several others. Attempts to cover up the fraud and organized criminal activity were made by the Polk County Sheriff’s Office and East Grand Forks Police Department. see above-mentioned lawsuit The fraud involves a company called Boardwalk Enterprises LLP that borrowed over half a million dollars. Annual payments of $30,000 were supposed to begin in 2003 but never did. Not a single payment was ever made and the mortgage was never filed. Virtually all traces of the loan disappeared from the record. Neither the lender nor the loaner said anything. They got caught as result of the audit. If they had not gotten caught, the statute of limitations would have run out in October of 2014. On May 7, 2014, local officials held an official (closed) meeting with representatives of Boardwalk Enterprises and their (Boardwalk’s) attorney to discuss a ‘solution’ to the unpaid loan problem. The May 7, 2014, meeting was suspicious because it was held at the private office of EGF City Attorney Ronald Galstad (Galstad, Jensen, & McCann). On May 7, 2014, EGF city administrator David Murphy told WDAZ news that city officials met with representatives of Boardwalk Enterprises and their “attorney”. However – to this very day – Murphy and city officials will not disclose who Boardwalk Enterprises’ attorney was on May 7, 2014. Facts and circumstances indicate that EGF City Attorney Ronald Galstad may have been the attorney for BOTH the City of EGF and Boardwalk Enterprises at the May 7, 2014, meeting. Some speculate Ronald Galstad was actually a member of the Boardwalk Enterprises ownership group because his private office was recently erected in the swanky Boardwalk entertainment complex that was built with unpaid loan money. Galstad was the attorney for the City of EGF over the ten years that everything was kept quiet while the statute of limitations slowly winded down. East Grand Forks and Grand Forks are a river city and the government funds that flowed in for disaster relief for the 1997 flood are enormous – in the hundreds of millions. The President of the Grand Cities (Grand Forks/East Grand Forks) Chamber of Commerce, Gary Wilfahrt, attempted to intimidate me with an extremely hostile email that told me the attention I was calling to this was ‘unproductive’ whereupon he insulted me beyond all reason. Wilfahrt and Galstad both sit on the Executive Committee of the Grand Cities Chamber of Commerce. At present – it is clear that a massive fraud and money laundering scheme has been exposed. However – it appears city officials are attempting to cover it up and treat it as if it is simply an innocuous unpaid debt situation. The amount of felonies that have taken place are countless. I hope this information will be beneficial to the National Center For Disaster Fraud. Respectfully, Attached: Audit, Letter to Auditor PS – the following web page contains useful information Timothy Charles Holmseth
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, Plaintiff prays for the following relief:
DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues set forth herein which are so triable. DATED this 8th day of September, 2014. Respectfully Submitted, Timothy Charles Holmseth 320 17th Street N.W. |
Fired CNN reporter Art Harris worked with East Grand Forks Police Department to intimidate news reporter that was assisting the Jacksonville FBI
http://writeintoaction.com/Nancy%20Grace%20Reporter%20Colluded%20with%20Minnesota%20Police.html
‘Chain of evidence’ records now being withheld by East Grand Forks officials as scandal grows
by Timothy Charles Holmseth
When the East Grand Forks Police Department (EGFPD) seized a journalist’s hard-drive in December, 2012, the Bureau of Criminal of Apprehension (BCA) would not forensically search it without another Warrant.
Determined – the EGFPD partnered with the Polk County Sheriff’s Office (PCSO) in Crookston, Minnesota where a special investigator searched the hard-drive with a special program that leaves no trace of the activity.
They found nothing – so somebody pulled out wires and rendered the hard-drive inoperable before returning it.
The hard-drive contains ultra sensitive interviews with suspects in a federal kidnapping – audio of a ‘wired’ informant capturing members of the legal community committing felonies – even audio of the the moment the journalist, Timothy Charles Holmseth, is told to put his hands behind his back – he’s under arrest.
But the truth comes out a little at a time.
On November 25, 2013 Sgt. Michael Norland, special investigations, PCSO, testified in court regarding a hard-drive he searched. The hearing was a MOTION TO COMPEL filed by Timothy Charles Holmseth (this reporter/writer throughout) regarding the return of a computer hard-drive that police had seized from him in December, 2012.
Holmseth’s Motion was a request for the State of Minnesota to produce any copy of his hard-drive that may have been made while it was in police custody.
The brief testimony of Investigator Norland shed light and insight on an insidious issue that has been obscured, largely as result of an ominous silence by local officials regarding years of institutional harassment and intimidation of Holmseth.
Sgt. Norland attended the hearing as a State’s witness to attest that he had not created any secondary copies of Holmseth’s hard-drive while it was in custody.
Sgt. Norland testified he performed a search on the hard-drive, which was seized by the EGFPD on December 14, 2012 from Holmseth’s home/office in East Grand Forks, Minnesota.
Norland testified the hard-drive was given to him on December 15, 2012 by EGFPD Officer Aeisso Schrage. Norland noted he did not actually search the hard-drive until some time in March, 2013. “[Officer Shrage] asked me to look for any illegal activity,” Norland said.
What was occurring with the hard-drive between December 15, 2012 and March, 2013 is not yet known.
However – questions now exist about why the EGFPD wanted Holmseth’s hard-drive in the first place, and whether or not law enforcement had any authority to search it at all.
The facts of the case paint a very dark picture that indicate the entire matter is a rolling deception, that has finally begun to unravel as result of a single District Judge being assigned to both a Family Division file, and a Criminal Division file; both centering on Holmseth.
Both court cases heavily involve a journalism project Holmseth endeavored in 2009 regarding a missing child from Florida named HaLeigh Cummings.
The darkest cloud hanging over the search and seizure issues surrounding the hard-drive comes directly from the words of Ronald Galstad, city attorney, East Grand Forks.
On January 4, 2013 during a Review Hearing, Attorney Galstad, the State’s prosecutor against Holmseth, advised Honorable Tamara Yon during court that the “Bureau of Criminal Apprehension” would not perform a forensic examination of Holmseth’s computer without a separate “warrant”. Galstad added that he planned on requesting a second warrant so the hard-drive could be searched.
There is no indication Galstad ever acquired any additional warrant following the hearing. Holmseth was never served or copied on any such Warrant.
Galstad’s statement and admission about the BCA made sense; because the language of the Search Warrant, which was signed by District Judge Jeff Remick on December 13, 2012 did not authorize a search of the computer or hard-drive.
“Now, therefore, you, EGFPD Officer Aeisso Shrage and other law enforcement officers acting under your direction and control, the peace officers aforesaid, hereby are commanded between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. to search the described premises, motor vehicle, and the person of Timothy Charles Holmseth for the above described property and things, to seize the described property and things, and to retain them in custody subject to court order and according to law”. – December 13, 2012 / Judge Jeff Remick / Warrant
But … this was no ordinary computer. This was no ordinary case. This is no ordinary situation.
Holmseth is an award-winning newspaper reporter that became a lighting rod for conflict in 2009 after he acquired highly volatile information about a kidnapping in Florida while interviewing police officers, legal professionals, and family members of a missing child named HaLeigh Cummings.
The missing child case was a high-media event because the little girl disappeared 75 miles north of Orlando on February 10, 2009; the same day a televised memorial was being held for slain toddler Caylee Anthony.
Holmseth conducted hundreds of hours of interviews in advance of countless articles and a book he wrote about the missing child case. There was no doubt Holmseth had uncovered something valuable, because he was interviewed by the FBI in 2010, and a copy of his book was requested by Major Gary Bowling, Director of Law Enforcement, Putnam County Sheriff’s Office, Palatka, Florida shortly after it was published.
Between 2009 and 2012 the police in East Grand Forks had developed a definite and growing interest in Holmseth.
Holmseth was a person the EGFPD wanted to shut up.
Lt. Rod Hajicek, EGFPD, telephoned Holmseth in 2009 and told him he had been contacted by an employee of Xentel, Inc. Hajicek told Holmseth that Xentel did not want Holmseth to publish the charity fraud story he was working on. Holmseth’s story revealed the shady organization was involved in Photoshopping a picture of HaLeigh Cummings and using it online to solicit donations.
This extremely improper action by Hajicek caused a significant problem for the City of East Grand Forks. Xentel has been sued by the Attorney General’s Office’s in Colorado, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Iowa, and South Carolina for defrauding the public through various scams.
In 2012 Holmseth wrote a detailed letter to the Minneapolis FBI. He reported that a participant of the child trafficking underground that took HaLeigh Cummings had explained to him that an organized group of criminals is kidnapping children under the auspices of ‘child protection’ with what they call a “rescue mission”.
Holmseth’s source also provided names of individuals operating a baby-selling operation that involved infants being sold for huge money; internationally, through the U.S. Embassy.
In his 2012 letter to the FBI, Holmseth provided names of licensed legal professionals that were deeply involved in the so-called rescue missions, which were actually quasi hoaxes, being executed in advance of charity fraud. Holmseth explained how the participants strategically plan a fake kidnapping in cooperation with members of the child’s family. When the news media announces the kidnapping, the apparent heart-breaking tragedy becomes extremely lucrative via donations to the family generated and driven by the Amber Alert.
In the case of the missing child HaLeigh Cummings, the charlatans that contacted Holmseth, and subsequently, the EGFPD, were involved with Nancy Grace. The group was advancing the hoax on the HLN network and Grace’s television program.
Police incident reports show Nancy Grace’s fake ‘reporter’ for the Cummings kidnapping, Art Harris, contacted Lt. Hajicek and requested he arbitraily arrest Holmseth. Hajicek then contacted Polk County Attorney Greg Widseth in what appeared to be a request for Widseth to manufacture a charge.
Although Widseth ignored Hajicek’s shady request, one has to wonder why the County Attorney didn’t immediately notice that Harris told Hajicek in an email that the FBI had visisted his friend at Xentel because of information they received from Holmseth.
The implications of Widseth’s ignorance may have been the difference between HaLeigh Cummings being found – or not being found.
Police incident reports at the EGFPD contain telephone calls from individuals that had just been questioned by law enforcement in Florida, per detective’s suspicion they had transported the missing child across state lines.
Kindapping suspects in Florida were actually telephoning the EGFPD and trying to secure the arrest of a journlalist in their town – and EGFPD tried to help them out.
Holmseth also explained how members of the underground had targeted him personally, because of what he knew. He explained how the criminal players contact family members of witnesses to their crimes, manipulate social services, generate false police reports, and viciously oppress any witnesses that speak up. The group uses cyber-stalking and the fear of the witness losing their children through bogus child protection actions.
Emails in the court record show Art Harris contacted the mother of Holmseth’s child and they discussed how she could file child protection reports against him that would make him appear mentally unstable, armed and dangerous. Five CPS reports were filed against Holmseth in only four months during the summer of 2009.
Holmseth received telephone calls from strangers using voice changing software that warned him he was going to lose custody of his children if he did not shut up about HaLeigh being alive.
The onslaught of false CPS reports temporarily stopped in October of 2009 after Polk County Social Services (PCSS) spoke with the child’s play therapist. Miranda Cassetta, CPS agent, PCSS documented the play therapist said she observed aboslutely no child abuse or negelect, and stated the child expressed love for his father and really enjoyed being with him.
Interestingly – nearly every bogus report made to CPS about Holmseth contained mention of his work on the Cummings kidnapping.
The information provided to federal authorities by Holmseth exposed the relationships and misconduct of several EGFPD officers, a Minnesota Public Defender, Guardian Ad Litem, Chief of Police, as well as the City Attorney.
In October of 2012, Holmseth found himself trapped in the proverbial Lion’s Den. He was now the Defendant in a criminal case filed against him by City Attorney Ronald Galstad based upon charges initiated by Lt. Hajicek.
The charges alleged Holmseth violated an Injunction filed in a Divorce Court in the State of Florida, despite Holmseth having never been married; nor had be been in the State of Florida. Holmseth was telephoned and warned he was going to be murdered if he attended the Broward County court hearing to defend himself.
Holmseth reported the death threat to Lt. Hajicek who made no report.
The City of East Grand Forks then brought criminal charges agaisnt Holmseth for publishing something in violation of the Florida Injunction. The EGFPD had no legal “venue” to bring the case.
But – they did not need a case if they could coerce the Defendant into a plea.
The City of East Grand Forks assumed authority they did not have, to bring a bogus charge they could not prove; because if Holmseth could be convicted of a crime – he would lose his credibility as a witness.
Holmseth narrowly escaped their trap.
Attorney Michael LaCoursiere, Minnesota Public Defender’s office, told Holmseth five minutes before his jury trial that if he didn’t accept an Alford plea, Galstad was going to call two uniformed police officers (Sgt. Chris Olson and Deputy Jesse Haugen) to lie on the witness stand to convict him. LaCoursiere advised Holmseth that the cops had a plan to have him put in St. Cloud State Prison.
Holmseth, a single parent, not willing to gamble with his children, accepted the plea under duress – but a double-cross was already planned.
On December 12, 2012 a trap was sprung amidst a scheduled Review Hearing when Holmseth was suddenly accused of violating the terms of the Alford agreement – but not told what, specifically, he had done. Galstad had quietly slipped a last second MOTION TO REVOKE to LaCoursiere via hand-delivery by Lt. Hajicek – LaCoursiere did not tell Holmseth about the filing.
The men were quietly networking and working together, so smoothly, it appeared they had done it many times.
The plan collapsed; however, when Honorable Yon refused to allow Galstad an impromptu Evidentiary Hearing, that day, without producing Discovery to Holmseth.
The next day, December 13, 2012 the EGFPD petitioned the District Court for a Search Warrant to seize Holmseth’s property – including his computer and hard-drive. The Affidavit submitted by Officer Schrage stated evidence was at risk of destruction and the computer needed to be immediately seized.
An agreement was subsequently reached between Holmseth and Galstad. On April 26, 2013 Holmseth’s property was returned via a court order by Honorable Yon.
But … the hard-drive didn’t work anymore.
A triple-cross – it was the second time Galstad and the City Police had broken an agreement with Holmseth.
In July, 2013 Holmseth filed a complaint to EGF Police Chief Michael Hedlund regarding the in-operable hard-drive and destruction of property. Hedlund responded to Holmseth stating it was not the fault of the police and advised Holmseth the City would not pay to recover it.
But – Hedlund’s letter contained an interesting statement. “The officers used a program that allowed them to view the contents of your hard-drive without any changes occurring during their investigation,” he said.
Hedlund’s admission declares the Sheriff’s Office deliberately uses a computer program that does not create entries in the Administrator log of the hard-drive.
Interestingly – the Police Chief actually knew that subtle fact and pointed it out in his letter.
This admission by the Police Chief creates a tremendous problem for City Attorney Galstad, and the all-around credibility and integrity of the EGFPD and PCSO.
Notabaly – Hedlund stated officers (plural) had searched Holmseth’s hard-drive, while Sgt. Norland made no mention of the others during his testimony.
During Holmseth’s cross exmination of Norland at the November 25 hearing, Galstad continuously objected to any questions Holmseth asked that did not relate directly to the issue of a ‘copy’ being made of the hard-drive.
Holmseth was taking flak because he was directly over the target.
Galstad had already told Judge Yon on January 4, 2013 that the BCA would not examine the computer’s hard-drive without a proper warrant.
The question now exists; under what authority did the PCSO or Chief Hedlund’s investigators enter Holmseth’s hard-drive and spend all day going through his private property? If the BCA did not have the authority; what authority did the PCSO or EGFPD have?
The attitude and mindset of the law enforcement officials involved in this matter indicate they are operating within a ‘culture’ that encourages abuse and miscondcuct.
When the property was returned to Holmseth by Shrage on April 26, 2013, the officer arrogantly boasted to Holmseth he had read all of his (Holmseth’s) daughter’s text messages between her and her boyfriend. Shrage appeared giddishly excited about his behavior.
Shrage’s comments about Holmseth’s teenage daughter are a manifestation of very serious issues that indicate the man is a predator. Holmseth worries Shrage may victimize other young girls the same way.
Detective Chris Olson, EGFPD, also appears to be a predator with tendencies to stalk and intimidate. During the execution of the police department’s Search Warrant on December 14, 2012, he asked Holmseth’s daughter where she worked. The teenage girl told him, and the very next morning, for the first time ever, Sgt. Olson appeared at the restaurant while the child was working and she had to wait on him.
The insult upon injury is Holmseth’s complete innocence from the very beginning. “Since they did not find any information that was of evidentiary value they did not make a copy of any of the information that was on your hard-drive,” Hedlund said.
The emerging facts have revealed a disturbing reality that could potentially affect past, present, and future cases.
The program Sgt. Norland used to spend an entire day going through Holmseth’s private property at his lesiure, made no changes to the computer. That means it leaves no record of law enforcement’s activity.
The tool appears to accomadate a procedure that is a deliberate violation of Search and Seizure laws intended to assist law enforcement escape keeping a chain of evidence.
Therefore – the police need only lie to a Judge and claim that evidence on a computer hard-drive is at risk of destruction or removal and needs to be seized and retained. After it is retained the Sheriff’s Office can view all the contents of the hard-drive without any record being generated.
During the hearing on November 25, 2013 Holmseth advised the Court he had a Request For Production he would like to submit to Galstad. Honorable Yon advised him to hand it to Galstad.
Galstad reviewed the document and declared he wasn’t going to give Holmseth anything.
This is a developing story.
Timothy Charles Holmseth
320 17th Street N.W.
Unit #17
East Grand Forks, MN
56721
tholmseth@wiktel.com
http://www.writeintoaction.com
218.773.1299
218.230.1310 (cell)
August 17, 2013
Michael Hedlund
Chief of Police
East Grand Forks Police Department
Chief Hedlund,
Please accept this complaint against Sgt. Detective Chris Olson and all others involved in the Misconduct.
1.In the fall of 2011 I made multiple written requests to your Department for all police reports concerning me. I needed the reports to prove my innocence in a court case scheduled in Florida.
2.I filled out a Freedom of Information (FOI) form and handed it in person to Officer Hart.
3.I submitted two more requests by email to Lt. Rodney Hajicek. The requests went unanswered.
4.I made multiple telephone calls to the Secretary at the police stations and left messages.
5.Your Department did not respond to me or fill my FOI request (in violation of City policy).
6.On April 2, 2012 I filed a complaint to you regarding the deliberate withholding of documents.
7.On April 10, 2012 you responded and apologized. You asked me to fill the FOI form out again, and advised me to send it directly to you, which I then did.
8.On April 18, 2012 you printed out the documents and I received them shortly thereafter.
9.On December 14, 2012 four of your police officers entered my home-office with a Search Warrant and seized my hard-drive, as well as other journalism and publishing equipment.
10.During the execution of the Warrant, Sgt. Chris Olson advised me there was an envelope at the police station with my name on it. Officer Hart was present, and added that he too had seen the envelope.
11.I went to the police station and retrieved the white envelope with my name on it. The envelope contained police incident reports. The reports had a “print” date of October 24, 2011 at the bottom of each sheet.
12.As date ranges reveals, the Reports that Officer Olson advised me to pick up had been printed 14 months prior.
13.After picking up the white envelope, I then had two copies of the Reports. (October 24, 2011 from Sgt. Olson – – – April 18, 2012 from Chief Hedlund).
14.I will direct you to case number 11002212 – report date 07/12/2011 – generated by Officer Mike Swang.
15.When I placed the two Reports next to each other, I saw they were not identical – although they should have been.
a.The October 24, 2011 version of the Report was MISSING information.
b.The October 24, 2011 version was missing information regarding Lt. Hajicek, the person that called the police on me, and audio evidence collected by Officer Swang.
c.The exact same Report, which I received from you in April of 2012, CONTAINED the information.
d.Because the sentences missing from the October 24, 2011 version of the Report re-appear in the April 18, 2012 version, it means whoever printed the Reports out in October of 2011 deliberately REMOVED the sentences before printing the documents.
e.After the individual that printed the Reports out completed the print job, they put the information back into the report.
f.Obviously – the person that printed out the Reports in October of 2011 decided to not turn them over to me and hid them.
16.The before mentioned facts introduce an issue regarding the integrity of your Internal Affairs investigation regarding my original complaint on the matter.
a.When you replied to my complaint on April 10, 2012, you asked me to fill out another FOI request form and advised me to re-submit it directly to you. This clearly means you could not find my original FOI request or the documents.
b.The white envelope containing police incident reports, which Sgt. Olson directed me to retrieve on December 12, 2012, were printed out in October of 2011.
c.Therefore, because somebody printed out the Reports on October 24, 2012, it means the FOI form (that you could not find) I gave to Officer Swang had been RECEIVED, but subsequently disappeared along with the printed Reports.
d.During you Internal Affairs investigation you were not able to find or access:
◾The Police Incident Reports (in the white envelope)
◾The original FOI form
e.This also means that whatever Internal Affairs investigation you conducted surely contains false statements from the officers you questioned.
Regards,
Timothy Charles Holmseth
Investigative Author
Cc: Mayor Lynn Stauss, Polk County Attorney Greg Widseth, Polk County Sheriff Barb Erdman, EGF City Attorney Ronald Galstad, Minneapolis FBI
Timothy Charles Holmseth
320 17th Street N.W.
Unit #17 East Grand Forks, MN
56721
tholmseth@wiktel.com
http://www.writeintoaction.com
218.773.1299
218.230.1310
August 15, 2013
Michael Hedlund
Chief of Police
East Grand Forks Police Department
Chief Hedlund,
Please accept this complaint against Officer Aeisso Schrage and Sgt. Detective Chris Olson.
On 12/14/13 Officer Schrage filed a false police report, whereby Schrage fabricated a statement, which he then attributed to me, using words I never said, in effort to support criminal charges brought against me by the City of East Grand Forks.
Please reference case number 12004365 – filed 12/14/13.
The first paragraph reads:
“On 12/14/2012 at approximately 1410 hours, TFO SHRAGE, along with DET OLSON, OFC HART, and OFC SCHILKE executed a search warrant for the residence of TIMOTHY HOLMSETH. When we arrived we overheard HOLMSETH talking to someone on the telephone, rather loudly, about taking some videos off the internet and that he “MUST HAVE FORGOTTEN SOME.” We knocked and announced and the door was answered by HOLMSETH.
The telephone call your officers eavesdropped upon was between me and my (then) lawyer, Michael LaCoursiere, public defender, State Public Defender Office (violation of my Attorney Client Privilege).
(Interestingly enough) Attorney Michael LaCoursiere telephoned me to discuss my case at the exact same time your police officers crept quietly up to the door of my home-office to listen through the door as LaCoursiere and I spoke.
The entire telephone call between LaCoursiere and I was recorded, from the sound of the initial ringing, to the end of the call.
At no time during the telephone call did I ever say the words “MUST HAVE FORGOTTEN SOME”.
Not only did I not say those specific words, but I did not say any variation of those words.
Schrage used all caps and placed quotation marks around the statement he falsely attributed to me. He applied special emphasis that required special disciplines that demonstrates he intended the quote to be relied upon word for word.
Sgt. Detective Chris Olson was the ranking officer present and apparently signed off on Schrage’s crime against me.
I will note that on July 9, 2013 Minnesota District Court Judge Honorable Tamara Yon forwarded a detailed complaint to the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility regarding the actions and conduct of Attorney Ronald Galstad and Attorney Michael LaCoursiere; some relating to this matter.
Because of your office’s multiple actions against me in violation of federal law I am copying the Minneapolis FBI.
Regards,
Timothy Charles Holmseth
Cc: Mayor Lynn Stauss, Polk County Attorney Greg Widseth, Polk County Sheriff Barb Erdman, EGF City Attorney Ronald Galstad, Minneapolis FBI
Police Chief and City Attorney using taxpayer money to defend personal misconduct?
by Timothy Charles Holmseth
On December 14, 2012 the East Grand Forks Police Department persuaded a Ninth Minnesota District Judge they needed to enter my (Timothy Charles Holmseth) home-office and seize my computer and hard-drive.
The Affidavit for the Warrant did not allege a crime had been committed. Rather – it stated the hard-drive needed to be ‘secured’ to prevent me from ‘destroying evidence’.
In reality – it was the City that would soon attempt to ‘destroy evidence’.
The District Judge granted the City Police a limited Warrant that allowed them to seize and hold items. When the police entered the premises, the computer was turned on and functioning. The Administrator’s activity log shows the computer was highly functional and used on a daily basis.
Attorney Bruce Ringstrom, Sr., Ringstrom Law Office, Detroit Lakes, negotiated on my behalf with East Grand Forks City Attorney Ronald Galstad. I agreed to withdraw my request to the District Judge for an investigation into official misconduct by Galstad and threats made to have police officers lie on the witness stand if I insisted on a jury trial. The threats were passed to me by Attorney Michael LaCouirsiere on behalf of Galstad.
In return for the withdrawal of my complaint, my hard-drive and property was to be given back. Of course – I was not charged with any crime because I had not committed one.
On April 26, 2013 the equipment was returned to me per the order of Honorable Tamara Yon. The equipment was returned by Detective Aeisso Schrage, EGFPD.
Wires had been moved around inside the computer and the hard-drive would not function. The damaged property was chronicled in real time through emails from me to Attorney Ringstrom; as well as photographs. The equipment has been analuyzed and assessed by specialists.
On August 12, 2013 Police Chief Michael Hedlund responded to a complaint I filed on the matter. He advised me the City Police Department would not make me whole. Hedlund stated the City wasn’t responsible. His letter was copied to City Attorney Ronald Galstad.
This latest action by City officials creates even more questions about the shady behavior and underworld attitudes of some big fish in a shrinking pond.
Would Attorney Ronald Galstad and Police Chief Michael Hedlund really be foolish enough to underestimate an experienced investigative journalist, and try to destroy evidence linking them to criminal activity?
Have local officials been in communication with organized crime from out of state? Did Lt. Deteceive Rodney Hajicek commit a crime by using his official position to assist a charity fraud from Fort Lauderdale called Xentel, Inc.
Are Police Chief Michael Hedlund and City Attorney Ronald Galstad drawing the City of East Grand Forks deeper and deeper into a legal quagmire that is actually comprised of their own personal troubles?
Is the local taxpayer flipping the bill to keep a few local officials out of trouble, which they created on their own?
It appears time will tell.
Several important matters are presently before a District Judge, and recent developments indicate the court system and State of Minnesota is really no longer amused.
Ronald Galstad and Michael LaCoursiere, public defender, presently face judicial review by the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility after a detailed complaint and affidavit was forwarded to the Director of OLPR by Honorable Yon.
by Timothy Charles Holmseth
Court was held on August 13, 2013 at the Polk County Justice Center, Crookston, Minnesota.
The hearing was proceeded over by the Honorable Tamara Yon.
The Court received an audio recording of a Florida resident that telephoned Timothy Holmseth in 2011. The caller warned him he was being followed and if he did not do as he was told, his parental rights were going to be targeted and altered.
The caller told him the “State” was going to take his children.
*The audio recording cannot be published per a Florida court order but is a matter of public record at the Polk County Justice Center, Crookston, Minnesota.
The Court also received a copy of a letter received by Timothy Holmseth from Police Chief Michael Hedlund, EGFPD, advising Holmseth he was investigating the destruction of Holmseth’s hard-drive while it was in police custody.
The following affidavit was submitted.
AFFIDAVIT OF TIMOTHY CHARLES HOLMSETH
VIOLATIONS BY THE STATE OF MINNESOTA AGAINST
TIMOTHY CHARLES HOLMSETH
I, Timothy Charles Holmseth, being a legal citizen of the United States of America, and State of Minnesota, hereby state the following is true to the best of knowledge:
The State of Minnesota is infringing upon the rights and protections, which are guaranteed to me under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution – “Freedom of Speech” and “Freedom of Press”
The State of Minnesota is infringing upon the rights and protections, which are guaranteed to me under Article 1; Section 3; Minnesota State Constitution – “Liberty of the Press”
The State of Minnesota has, and is, violating my Constitutional rights whereby it has paid a regular wage to a single employee, Matthew J. Petrovich, to actively monitor the content of my publication http://www.writeintoaction.com.
I hold a degree in media communications; have been employed for over a decade in the media industry; been recognized with first place awards by the North Dakota Newspaper Association; worked as a news reporter at newspapers of record; possess written letters of reference from elected officials; authored a book; and operated a freelance business for feature writing for national magazines.
http://www.writeintoaction.com is a legal publication of good repute that openly discusses matters of the public’s interest.
http://www.writeintoaction.com contains stories, articles, media, and commentary of immediate interest to the citizens of East Grand Forks, Minnesota; Polk County, Minnesota; Greater Minnesota; and Grand Forks, North Dakota. The website is providing the public with valuable information about the activities of public officials.
http://www.writeintoaction.com contains information of interest to visitors from throughout the United States interested in the high profile cases of the missing child HaLeigh Cummings, and the Casey Anthony murder trial.
The truthfulness and accuracy of the content published at http://www.writeintoaction.com has never been contested via a civil lawsuit.
The State of Minnesota has been illegally monitoring the content of my publication and through the actions of its agent Matthew Petrovich, weighing and considering the content of my publication as a relevant factor in assessing me as a parent in advance of custody rulings.
The monitoring activities are in violation of state and federal constitutional protections.
The motivation compelling the monitoring activities is in violation of state and federal law.
Matthew Petrovich is a Guardian Ad Litem that was assigned to my family case file with instructions by the Court to coordinate parenting-time exchanges between the Parties and make short-term and long-term custody recommendations to the Court.
On July 23, 2013 Matthew Petrovich, after I confronted him, admitted in an email that he monitors my website.
He stated:
Matthew Petrovich has been monitoring my publication on behalf of the State of Minnesota for over 1-1/2 years with no expressed legal authority or officially stated basis for doing so, whereby:
The State of Minnesota has not provided me with a copy of a court order from a District Judge that authorizes or instructs Matthew Petrovich to monitor my publication.
The State of Minnesota has not provided me with a copy of a court order from a District Judge explaining or detailing what content my website is supposed to be monitored in search of.
The State of Minnesota has not provided me with a copy of a court order or Warrant from a District Judge providing a start and end date to the monitoring activities.
The State of Minnesota has not provided me the name of the agency and/or agencies that directed Matthew Petrovich to monitor my publication.
The State of Minnesota has not provided me the name of the individual agent, and/or agents, which receives or assess the results of the monitoring activities of Matthew Petrovich.
My In Forma Paupris application to the Court was approved by the District Judge and I have been authorized to represent myself Pro Se.
My In Forma Paupris status and Pro Se representation is a matter of the court file and is a fact known to Matthew Petrovich.
Every single requirement associated with my legal paperwork fall squarely upon my shoulders. I must draft my own motions; prepare my own affidavits; do my own legal research; study and apply legal etiquette, etc. Acting as my own attorney is emotionally taxing, time consuming, and costly.
Matthew Petrovich has advised me ad nauseum, that through monitoring my website, he has gleaned I am using my “computer” while my son is under my care. He advises me he knows the dates and times of my publishing activities.
Matthew Petrovich openly chastises, criticizes, harangues, and harasses me about using my “computer” while my son is in my custody. He connects my use of my computer, to his custody recommendations to the Court.
I have confronted Matthew Petrovich about his ominous tactics of intimidation and advised him his behavior and activities are interfering with my ability represent myself in court.
Matthew Petrovich is deliberately and maliciously monitoring me to intimidate me and censor my publishing activities regarding the official misconduct of officials within the Ninth Minnesota Judicial District.
The State of Minnesota, via the direct activities of the East Grand Forks Police Department, East Grand Forks City Attorney’s Office (Ronald Galstad), State of Minnesota via STATE OF MINNESOTA VS TIMOTHY CHARLES HOLMSETH has violated the before-mentioned rights of Timothy Charles Holmseth, whereby: In June of 2009 Lt. Detective Rodney Hajicek, EGFPD, telephoned me and asked me if I knew a person named Donna Wagoner.
Per EGF Police Incident Report # 09002015, Lt. Hajicek advised me the Company (Xentel, Inc.) Donna Wagoner worked for did not want me to write anything about them.
Lt. Hajicek advised me he had also received a call from a XXXXXX form XXXXXXX named XXX XXXRY XXXXXXX. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Crystal Sheffield, mother of the missing child HaLeigh Cummings.
XXX XXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX member, Jeremiah Regan, at the time XXX called Lt. Hajicek, was under investigation by the Putnam County Sheriff’s Office, Florida for transporting the missing child HaLeigh Cummings across state lines.
Donna Wagoner was assisting XXX XXXXXXX with media relations regarding a charity (scam) called “HaLeigh Bug” being erected (by Xenetel, Inc.) in the name of the missing child HaLeigh Cummings to obtain donations from generous Americans.
Lt. Hajicek advised me on the telephone he supported Donna Wagoner and XXX XXXXXXX in their requests that I not write anything about them and pressured me to cease and desist.
Art Harris, Busystreet Productions, Georgia, emailed Lt. Hajicek and expressed his outrage that the FBI visited Donna Wagoner’s place of employment (Xentel, Inc.) because of information I (Timothy Holmseth) had provided them regarding a Photoshopped picture of the missing child HaLeigh Cummings being used in an online scam.
According to sworn statements made by XXX XXXXXXX to XXXXXXX, Art Harris was the official “media consultant” working for XXXX and Crystal Sheffield.
Xentel, Inc. is a company with an extensive history of fraud and has been successfully sued by the Attorney General’s Office of multiple states including Iowa, Colorado, Missouri and Ohio.
Lt. Hajicek and EGF City Attorney Ronald Galstad continued developing a relationship with XXX XXXXXXX for several years, and in 2011 they assisted her in obtaining a fraudulent domestic violence order against me, through the XXXXX County, Florida Family Courts, whereby an Injunction on my publication was obtained, using Florida domestic violence law (despite me having never met XXX XXXXXXX nor having entered the state of Florida).
The City of East Grand Forks deliberately withheld and refused my document requests for police incident reports that would have proved I had no domestic relationship with XXX XXXXXXX, had not been to Florida, and never met XXX.
Lt. Rodney Hajicek generated no police report and conducted no investigation when I reported to him that XXX XXXXXXX’s private investigator, William E. Staubs, telephoned me and warned me that if I showed up for the Florida court hearing I would surely be murdered. William Staubs swore to this in a notarized Affidavit.
Multiple witnesses attested to the fact XXX XXXXXXX, XXX XXXXXXX’s (felon) XXXX, brandished an illegal Mini-14 Assault Carbine rifle and boasted it was the gun that was going to kill “Timothy Holmseth”.
The EGFPD arrested me, jailed me, and used the authority of the State of Minnesota to charge me with a crime despite the State having no venue on the matter.
Misconduct complaints against State Public Defender Michael LaCoursiere, and State Prosecutor Ronald Galstad, at my request, were forwarded to the Office of Lawyer’s Professional Responsibility (OLPR) by Honorable Tamara Yon, 9th Minnesota Judicial District.
The Affidavit and Complaint to the OLPR set forth details supporting allegations that Galstad and LaCoursiere threatened to have police officers lie on the stand to convict me if I insisted on a jury trial and didn’t accept a no-contest (Alford) plea.
The Affidavit and Complaint sets forth details of how the EGFPD and State of Minnesota illegally violated my Attorney Client Privilege and generated provably false statements (false quotes attributed to me) (provably false because all statements were surreptitiously recorded by me) in a police report.
The Affidavit and Complaint sets forth details of how the EGFPD and State of Minnesota seized my hard drive and then deliberately ruined it in custody.
by Timothy Charles Holmseth
In 2009 I learned that that a picture of the missing child HaLeigh Cummings that was scrolling on a website called http://www.haleighbug.com was a Photoshopped fake.
Teresa Neves, HaLeigh’s paternal grandmother had instructed her family advocate, Rebecca Thomas, to call me. The situation was serious because there was an Amber Alert for HaLeigh and somebody was chopping photos of her with editing software to create false images, situations, and scenarios.
I interviewed a Photoshop expert named Elvin Thomas and he explained in detail how the photo was a complete fake.
I contacted ibi Designs, Boca Raton, Florida – they were the company that developed the website that was featuring the fake photo. I spoke with Ed Butera. I explained to Butera that the picture of HaLeigh Cummings published at http://www.haleighbug.com was fraudulent.
Butera assured me that his company was not responsible for altering the photo. He forwarded me the original emails he had received that contained the pictures as attachments.
The emails Butera received had come from Donna Wagoner (Florida) through a business email account at a company called Xentel. I contacted Wagoner at the email address that I received from Butera and asked her the same questions I asked Butera.
Wagoner called the police in East Grand Forks, Minnesota and spoke with Lt. Detective Rodney Hajicek.
The following is an excerpt from the police report.
“On 6/18/09 I Det. Rodney Hajicek I [sic] spoke with Donna Wagoner from Ft. Lauderdale Fl and she stated that she had been receiving emails from Tim Holmseth in East Grand Forks. Tim states that he is an investigative reporter and is bothering Donna Wagoner and the company that she works for about modifying a picture…”
“She asked that I call Tim and explain to him that they want nothing to do with him and inform him that they (the company) does not want him using there [sic] name and attaching it to items on the internet.”
Hajicek further notes in his Report that he called me on the telephone and advised me he had received several complaints about me and would be advising callers to seek harassment orders against me.
I am college educated; an expereinced and award-winning newspaper reporter. I understand enough about the First Amendment to know local police departments do not telephone reporters and jounalists and wave them off stories.
During this same time-window, I submitted the Photoshopped picture of HaLeigh to the Minneapolis FBI.
Now, let’s take a look at the company Lt. Hajicek is assisting under Color of Law.
It should be pointed out that the following are just samples because every complaint filed against Xentel across the United States would fill a small book.
STATE OF MISSOURI VS. XENTEL, INC.
The Missouri Attorney General’s Office sued this company in August of 2003 for violating Missouri consumer protection laws by using manipulative, high-pressure techniques to solicit donations and by making repeated solicitation calls to Missourians on the state No Call List. In May of 2004 the Missouri Attorney General’s Office obtained a court order against Xentel requiring them to pay $75,000 to the state and to implement and maintain procedures to ensure future compliance with state consumer protection and telemarketing laws. On February 4, 2008, the Missouri Attorney General’s Office obtained another court order requiring Xentel to adopt very stringent policies to ensure compliance with the law, as well as payment of $80,0000.
STATE OF COLORADO VS. XENTEL, INC.
Through the unlawful practices of their business, vocation, or occupation, Defendants have deceived, misled, and financially injured consumers in Colorado. Specifically, Defendants have solicited money from Coloradans through the use of illegal and unregistered solicitation campaigns and have repeatedly violated the Colorado Charitable Solicitations Act and other consumer protection statutes. Therefore, the Colorado Attorney General believes these legal proceedings are in the public interest and are necessary to safeguard citizens from Defendants’ charitable fraud and unlawful business activities.
STATE OF IOWA VS XENTEL, INC.
Professional Fundraiser “Xentel” Ordered Not to Make Deceptive Calls in Iowa
“Iowans should see an end to this operation’s deceptive telemarketing for the Iowa Professional Fire Fighters Association and others,” Miller said.
DES MOINES. Attorney General Tom Miller announced today that an Iowa District Court judge has entered a consent judgment and order against Xentel, Inc., requiring the Ft. Lauderdale-based company to stop abusive and misleading practices in its professional fundraising calls and solicitations to Iowans.
Xentel makes tens of thousands of telemarketing calls each year into Iowa on behalf of the “Iowa Professional Fire Fighters Association.”
“Xentel is prohibited from implying their telemarketers are fire fighters or misrepresenting that money will be used locally,” Miller said. “There are many restrictions to prevent deception.”
The consent judgment also provides that local law enforcement or fire departments that experience citizen complaints or other problems with Xentel’s fundraising can ask the company to terminate fundraising in that community, and Xentel must honor the request.
Lt. Hajicek was also in communication with Art Harris, blogger. Harris had been fired from CNN and was running with a band of gypsies in Florida that associate themselves with missing child cases.
Email communications between Lt. Hajicek and Art Harris show that Harris was furious that the FBI had gone to Xentel to question Wagoner. Harris wanted Hajicek to arrest me and the two were clearly discussing the hopes of that happening.
Hajicek told Harris there was nothing he could do to help him, but assured him he would forward his information to Polk County Attorney Greg Widseth to see if anything could be done there.
That means Lt. Hajicek had become aware the FBI was interested in the information I had given them about the photo. With that in mind, continue to observe Hajicek. Despite the FBI investigating information I sent them, and Hajicek having DIRECT EVIDENCE regarding the matter, he continues to pursue me for arrest. He DOES NOTHING to alert the FBI.
When I submitted a document request to Chief Michael Hedlund for the emails between Harris and Hajicek, I was told Hajicek destroyed them. I was subsequently able to obtain copies from Attorney Widseth.
In 2012, Maria Burgun, a wealthy business person from Broward County, Florida met with the Southern District FBI and gave them information she had about the missing child HaLeigh Cummings.
Burgun advised the FBI she had invested several hundred thousand dollars into a biofuels operation. The money subsequently vanished and she believes it was used to fund a fraudulent operation that surrounded the kidnapping of HaLeigh Cummings.
Burgun told the FBI the name of the person that admitted to helping Donna Wagoner Photoshop the picture of HaLeigh Cummings.
In 2011, Lt. Hajicek was still communicating with the South Florida organization. The police department was still receiving out-of-state requests for me to be arrested. Files were still being created by honest officers, and then deleted and destroyed by Hajicek.
In 2011, East Grand Forks City Attorney Ronald Galstad, Sgt. Detective Chris Olson, and Lt. Rodney Hajicek became involved in an illegal out-of-state scheme, carefully orchestrated and deployed to circumvent the Minnesota Court System in the Ninth Judicial District because it would not act adversely against a publisher that was not breaking the law (me).
In 2011, Ronald Galstad signed my arrest warrant.
I refused to plead guilty to his illegal trumped up bogus crap.
In 2012, Michael LaCoursiere, State Public Defender’s Office, told me if I didn’t accept a no-contest plea, Ronald Galstad would have Sgt. Detective Chris Olson and Polk County Deputy Jesse Haugen lie on the witness stand to convict me.
When that plan didn’t work, I reported the two attorneys to the Minnesota Bar, FBI, and a District Judge.
In response, the EGFPD obtained a Search and Seizure Warrant for my home-office and seized my hard-drive.
They deliberately ruined it.
Why are select public officials assisting and protecting an organization like Xentel?