Posts Tagged ‘Wetterling Foundation’

Minnesota law enforcement cover-up

by Timothy Charles Holmseth on July 21, 2017 at 5:41 P.M. CST

Public records strongly suggests Minnesota law enforcement does not possess the skull of Jacob Wetterling.


Jacob Wetterling

If that is a fact – it effectively means members of law enforcement and the judicial community criminally conspired to stage the missing child’s recovery, and presented the public with a false confession from Danny Heinrich, so the case could be officially closed.

The ‘skull’ is imperative to the truth about Jacob because:

  • Heinrich said he shot Jacob in the head
  • Heinrich said he buried Jacob
  • Heinrich said he moved Jacob’s remains a year later including the “skull”

Evidence already part of the record shows law enforcement does not have the child’s skull, and in all reality, possess no remains of the child – only planted scraps of clothing and animal bones.

If the recovery of Jacob Wetterling is a lie – it is a huge lie that involves police, sheriffs, BCA, FBI, prosecutors, and judges.

I am going to walk you right though it.

The following is from Heinrich’s confession in court.


MR. SCHLEICHER: After you dug the grave with the Bobcat, what did you do?
THE DEFENDANT: I placed Jacob in the grave, and then I covered it back up with the Bobcat.
MR. SCHLEICHER: Okay. And was Jacob wearing all of his clothing at the time.
THE DEFENDANT: Yes, he was.
MR. SCHLEICHER: And can you describe what you recall clothing he was wearing?
THE DEFENDANT: His reflective vest, his red jacket, blue sweat pants. Tennis shoes came off when I put him into the grave, so I threw them — I didn’t bury them with him in the grave.

– – –

MR. SCHLEICHER: After you dug the grave with the Bobcat, what did you do?
THE DEFENDANT: I placed Jacob in the grave, and then I covered it back up with the Bobcat.
MR. SCHLEICHER: Okay. And was Jacob wearing all of his clothing at the time.
THE DEFENDANT: Yes, he was.
MR. SCHLEICHER: And can you describe what you recall clothing he was wearing?
THE DEFENDANT: His reflective vest, his red jacket, blue sweat pants. Tennis shoes came off when I put him into the grave, so I threw them — I didn’t bury them with him in the grave.

– – –


You have seen Heinrich’s testimony that Jacob’s body and clothes were buried on October 22, 1989.

As part of a plea deal in 2016, which included Heinrich would NOT be charged with Jacob’s murder, and would see counts of child pornography dropped, he told a Minnesota judge that he returned to Jacob’s grave about year after murdering the child and found a item of clothing uncovered.

Heinrich claims he returned to the body, and brought a “plastic bag” and “army entrenching tool”. Upon arriving at the grave, Heinrich said he “noticed” the grave was partially uncovered.

This means Heinrich is saying he took a flashlight, walked to Jacob’s grave, with a plastic bag, whereupon he “noticed” the grave was partially uncovered. That alone defies common sense logic, and the chronological decisions he is making are mixed up and out of order.

But there is one statement Heinrich made that cannot be changed. Heinrich said he placed Jacob’s “jacket” “bones” and “skull” into the bag that he brought with.

Heinrich said he never did any digging at all because it was already that uncovered.


THE DEFENDANT: I didn’t drive. I walked back again. I walked back. It was late at night again, probably around midnight, with a flashlight. I noticed — I shined the area and noticed that the grave was partially uncovered. You could see his red jacket.
MR. SCHLEICHER: Above the ground?
THE DEFENDANT: Above the ground.

MR. SCHLEICHER: All right. Did that cause you concern, that you could see the jacket?
THE DEFENDANT: Yes, it did.
MR. SCHLEICHER: What did you do?
THE DEFENDANT: I, I, I can’t remember. I had a bag with me, a garbage bag. I placed as many – his jacket, his bones, his skull into that bag to move. I figure I’ve got to move it.
MR. SCHLEICHER: You had a shovel with you?
THE DEFENDANT: I had an army entrenching tool with me.
MR. SCHLEICHER: So you dug up as many of the remains as you could gather?
THE DEFENDANT: I never dug any. It was already that uncovered.

You saw the evidence yourself – Heinrich said he moved the “skull” and Jacob’s (human) bones to another location.


The following is from the Searh Warrant.

“On August 31, 2016 a search warrant was executed at 27725 Business 23 East Paynesville Stearns County. During that search a red nylon jacket preliminary consistent with the jacket Jacob Wetterling was wearing at the time of his abduction, bone fragments, and teeth were recovered. Later examination by experts determined neither the teeth nor bones were human. Heinrich was present at 27725 23 East during the execution of the initial search warrant. He provided additional information referencing an initial burial site near where he assaulted and killed Jacob Wetterling. At a later time, approximately a year later, Heinrich moved the remains from the original scene 27725 Business 23 East. Law enforcement now request authority to return to 27725 for more extensive examination.”

Expert determined the teeth and bones were not human.


The August 31, 2016 warrant makes reference to Heinrich mentioning an “initial burial site” during the search – and Heinrich claiming he “moved the remains from the original scene 27725 Business 23 East”.

For some reason, the officer then requests a second warrant, which is simply a request to return to the address of the first warrant.

On September 2, 2016, law enforcement conducted a second search.

The officer states, “I took into custody the property and things listed below.”

  • Apparent Bones
  • Boy’s t-shirt with name Wetterling on it
  • Mesh Shirt
  • Miscellaneous Fabric

Here is what the Star-Tribune reported on September 4, 2016.

The Stearns County Sheriff’s Office said Saturday that dental records confirmed that the remains were Jacob’s. Additional DNA testing will be conducted by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension.

The Wetterlings have filed a lawsuit to have investigation records sealed.

Visit to learn about a detailed confession taken with two police officers present, that strongly suggests law enforcement and the Wetterlings have known for decades what happened to Jacob, who did it, and have conspired to cover it up while running a fraudulent Foundation in Jacob’s name.


by Timothy Charles Holmseth on July 14, 2017 at 11:06 A.M. CST

Do Jerry and Patty Wetterling share blame for what happed to their son Jacob?

Jerry and Patty Wetterling feel like they are being blamed for Jacob’s abduction and murder in 1989.

Jerry and Patty Wetterling

Maybe there’s a reason for that.

The Wetterling have filed a lawsuit against Stearns County, Minnesota to seal files from the investigation into the kidnapping and murder of their son.

After filing the lawsuit they released a statement to the public, which included this:

‘The sheriff, many agents and investigators, the Stearns County Attorney and US Attorney’s office locked up a dangerous predator who caused so much harm to so many for so long. Let the blame be on the man who did this.’

“Let the blame be on the man who did this.” [emphasis added]


Are the Wetterlings to blame?

Is there something in the investigation files that incriminates the Wetterlings?

KARE 11 reported, “According to the affidavit, Jerry Wetterling requests a temporary restraining order to prevent information from being released regarding “certain information relating to my marriage and family that I believe is protected from disclosure by the United States Constitution and the Minnesota Constitution.” 

“At no time during the investigation were we ever told that personal information about our marriage or family would ever become public,” Jerry Wetterling states in the affidavit. “We always expected that all such information would remain private,” KARE 11 reported.

KARE 11 reported, “The Wetterlings are seeking to keep that portion of the file private, saying releasing it “will cause us and our family to suffer considerable and irreparable harm.”

What did Jerry and Patty Wetterling tell law enforcement, during the investigation into their son’s abduction, that was so private that it causes “irreparable harm” if released? Is there something about the Wetterlings ‘marriage’ or ‘family’ that resulted in their son being kidnapped on a dark road by a person (or persons) that appeared to be waiting for the child?

The Wetterlings, in career mode, further stated: We ask that we all turn our energy towards preventing any other child from being a victim of sexual assault. Let us provide children with better tools and mentor them to build healthy relationships.

I have a question.

Why does the Wetterling’s formal statement only ask the public’s energy be put toward the prevention of “sexual abuse” but not mention ‘kidnapping’ and ‘murder’?

The following is from the Jacob Wetterling Foundation – Jacob Wetterling Resource Center (Patty Wetterling’s career).

End all forms of child abuse, neglect, and exploitation through training, education, advocacy, prevention and awareness, providing care and treatment for children, families, and adult survivors.

We work to end all forms of child maltreatment through education, training and prevention while advocating for and serving children, adult survivors and communities.

Jerry and Patty – you forgot about kidnapping and murder – remember that part?

So here’s the deal Jerry and Patty.

Instead of you presenting yourselves as being beyond the scope of any suspicion, heroic survivors, fountains of wisdom and information, and gracious recipients to generous donors, let’s do this instead…

You withdraw your lawsuit against Stearns County and the American public (and Write Into Action) sees all the evidence in the Jacob Wetterling investigation including your personal background, as well as the DNA and forensics of whatever was supposedly found of Jacob.

Remember Patty – you ran for Congress (I interviewed you in my office at the Roseau Times-Region) and you’re a public figure that spoke about your son’s abduction during your pursuit of government office with intent to change or steer public policy.

By the way Jerry and Patty – somebody out there doesn’t like me talking about the Jacob Wetterling case and suggested I could get my head cut off.

The group suggested they know Danny Heinrich.

Do you have any idea who ‘The Firm’ is Jerry and Patty?

 Jerry and Patty WetterlingThey also call themselves ‘The Deep State’ when they telephone me using numbers of President Donald Trump, Clinton Global, CNN, and many others.